 |
 |
|
|
Facial
nerve network & parotid gland
please
place the mouse on the image
|
Salivary
Tumours, Stones & Strictures
Benign
Tumours
ECD
or Extra-Capsular
Dissection
ECD is a specialist procedure that is not widely available. It was
developed by Nicholson (Christie Hospital Manchester) in the 1950s
but overlooked by the surgical community. Its application has been
championed by Professor McGurk.
The main advantage of the operation is
that it preserves most
or all of the gland and reduces the risk of injury to the
facial nerves. Patients
leave hospital sooner and the risk of complications and side effects is significantly reduced.
Approximately
80 patients per million in the British population develop benign salivary
tumours each year. The
parotid gland is the most commonly affected site.
Current
Practice - Superficial & Total Parotidectomy
The
main risk with parotid surgery is an injury to the facial nerves that
run through the Parotid Gland. (Please pass the mouse over the
diagram top left) The
traditional operation for a benign tumour that lies above the nerve is a
Superficial Parotidectomy (video left) and for a tumour lying below the
nerve, a Total Parotidectomy.
If the nerve is
damaged during surgery then varying degrees of facial paralysis result. The traditional
operations mentioned above are more disruptive than the minimally invasive ECD
procedure and carry greater risk of nerve damage. Another common side effect is Frey's syndrome where the secretory
nerves from the damaged parotid gland join with the skin so the skin of
the cheek sweats
while eating.
Total Parotidectomy also results in a hollowing of the cheek due to removal of the parotid
gland.
Extra-Capsular
Dissection ECD (video left)
ECD
is less invasive than traditional
operations, it can be performed through a smaller incision and the side effects
are much reduced because the operation is less disruptive to the tissues.
It is a much more conservative procedure with the same low risk
of tumour recurrence (1-2% at 10y) as the traditional larger operations. However
it has a significantly lower risk of side effects. (see table below - M
McGurk published results - (pubmed Extracapsular dissection- minimal
resection for benign disease BJOMS Jan 2011)
M
McGurk published results - (pubmed Extracapsular dissection- minimal
resection for benign disease BJOMS Jan 2011)
Results
published: a large series from Germany
|
Type of Surgery
|
Recurrent tumour at 10y
|
Permanent Nerve Injury
|
Temporary Nerve Injury
|
Frey’s Syndrome
|
|
Total Parotidectomy
|
1-2%
|
4-6%
|
70%
|
66%
|
|
Superficial Paroditectomy
|
1-2%
|
1-2%
|
30%
|
38%
|
|
ECD
|
1-2%
|
1-2%
|
10%
|
0%
|
|
Malignant
tumours
Incidence
The incidence of malignant salivary
gland disease is approximately
eight patients per million population each year. Since they are uncommon, experience in
dealing with them is vital and treatment has to be tailored to each person.
In general the
size of the tumour and its biological grade are important to
outcome. Treatment is usually a combination of surgery followed by radiotherapy.
Treatment
If a malignant salivary tumour is suspected, a thorough evaluation is indicated
normally with CT/MRI scans and some form of biopsy.
Surgery is now more conservative when used in conjunction with post operative
radiotherapy. In most instances the facial nerve can now be preserved. Treatment
policy is mainly determined by the size of the tumour and to a lesser extent by
its grade and site. Treatment is equally successful for the parotid,
submandibular gland and mouth lesions.
Salivary
Stones - New
Minimally Invasive Methods of Treatment
The management of salivary stones has been revolutionised by European teams in London, Paris, Erlangen and Milan . The combined results of all the centres in
more than 4,600 cases show that less than 3% of patients required salivary gland removal with
83% of stones
retrieved.
However
the
current
standard of care in most surgical units for stones in the submandibular or parotid gland is
still gland removal with all the attendant risk to the associated nerves.
Baskets
Small mobile stones
of 4 - 5 mm can be removed with small wire
baskets. (picture left and video left)
These baskets
can be introduced through a small endoscope or under radiological control and patients are treated in the outpatient setting under local
anaesthesia. The results are excellent with about 70%-75% of stones retrieved.
Lithotripter
Larger
stones, (5-8mm) can be broken with a salivary gland lithotripter using
ultrasound.
The treatment is more effective for parotid stones (60% clearance) than submandibular (30%) so
the treatment tends to be saved for parotid stones.
Endoscope
Assisted Submandubular Gland Surgery Fixed submandibular stones
larger than 6mm are removed by an endoscope assisted surgical technique.
Under day
care general anaesthesia, an incision in made along the floor of the mouth, the
submandibular duct is found and traced back into the gland with the help of the micro endoscope. The stone is found and released.
The operation takes about 30-40min. Results are excellent with stone retrieval rates of 97%
Endoscope
Assisted Parotid Surgery (video
left) Fixed parotid stones
above 8mm are also removed by an endoscope assisted
surgical method. Under general anaesthesia an endoscope is introduced into the parotid duct. A
small face lift incision is made in front of the ear to expose the parotid gland. The light on the end of the endoscope guides the surgeon on to the stone which is
released, preserving the parotid gland. The operation takes about 1 hr. Stone retrieval rates are excellent, 97%
Advances in optical instruments have made
available micro-endoscopes (1mm diameter) that allow excellent visualisation of the
salivary ducts. Micro-instruments can be passed through the endoscopes to target stones
and strictures
Salivary Stricture
Incidence
|
|
|
Before and after
stricture dilation: please place the mouse on the
image |
|
In the group of patients that present with symptoms of obstruction (gland swells at mealtime) the cause is a salivary stone in 75% of cases but in the other 25% it is a stricture in the duct wall. The majority of strictures are in the parotid (75%) and more strictures occur in women than men. The cause of strictures is unknown.
Traditionally there was no way of managing strictures apart from removing the salivary gland.
New Minimally Invasive Methods of Treating Salivary Strictures
There are two approaches both provided in the outpatient setting under
local anaesthesia
Endoscope assisted dilation of stricture:
An endoscope is introduced into the salivary duct. Mild strictures can be dilated flushing
the duct with
a saline solution under pressure. Tighter strictures can be opened will a small
hand drill or by a small balloon that can be inflated within the stricture.
Radiological guided
balloon dilation of the stricture:
Under radiological control a thin catheter is passed into the duct then the balloon inflated to stretch the stricture. Successful dilation of the stricture is achieved in about 75% of cases.
______________________
|